Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-12 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Grey | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 848.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 449 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.67 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 II is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 87.2 against 80.1. The Xperia 5 II design is much thinner and extremely lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Xperia 5 II counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xperia 5 II also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Xperia 5 II, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Sony Xperia 5 II has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, the Sony Xperia 5 II also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Xperia 5 II features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Xperia 5 II, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
The Xperia 5 II is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.