Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Green and Pink | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a overall score of 90.5 against 79.4. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Xperia 5 III has the previous 11 version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The Xperia 5 III is a lighter phone than Galaxy A35 5G, but both are 0.32inches thick.
The Sony Xperia 5 III counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. Sony Xperia 5 III counts with a much faster processing unit than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Sony Xperia 5 III also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a little bit better camera than Xperia 5 III, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, slower video frame rates and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a way more megapixels back camera.
Xperia 5 III has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Sony Xperia 5 III, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.