Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Green and Pink | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 449 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia 5 III's score of 90.5. Galaxy A52 5G's design is somewhat heavier and a bit thicker than the Sony Xperia 5 III. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Sony Xperia 5 III has Android 11 version, providing the user some nice extra features.
The Xperia 5 III has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia 5 III also has 2 GB more RAM. The Sony Xperia 5 III features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G captures much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia 5 III, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low light captures and videos, and they both have the same camera sensor size and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution.
Xperia 5 III counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Xperia 5 III also has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G's battery life is just as good as the Sony Xperia 5 III one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.