Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-04-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Green and Pink | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 449 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xperia 5 III has a score of 90.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62's 88.1 global score. The Xperia 5 III construction is much lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy F62, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect.
Galaxy F62 counts with a display that's just as good as the display in Xperia 5 III, because although the Galaxy F62 has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per display inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen. Xperia 5 III has a bit faster processor than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
Sony Xperia 5 III counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F62, and although they both have a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB, the Sony Xperia 5 III also has 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Xperia 5 III, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy F62 takes better photographs and videos than Xperia 5 III, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.