Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-05-30 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.10 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1910mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 290 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has an overall score of 80, which is much better than the Sony Xperia acro S's general score of 62. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is just a little bit heavier than the Sony Xperia acro S, it's notably thinner and way newer. The Sony Xperia acro S features just a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3, although it has a bit lower pixels density, a way smaller screen and a way lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features a superior memory to install applications and games than Xperia acro S, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3 features a greater performance than Xperia acro S, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Google Pixel 3 takes way better photos and videos than Xperia acro S, because it has a more megapixels camera, a way better (4K) video resolution and a way bigger diafragm aperture. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Sony Xperia acro S, because it has a 2915mAh battery capacity instead of 1910mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.