Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-05-30 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.10 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1910mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 290 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is a lot better than Xperia acro S's 62 global score. Google Pixel 3a XL's construction is way newer and notably thinner, but heavier than the Xperia acro S. These phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and Xperia acro S has Android 4.0.4 version.
Xperia acro S features a bit more vivid screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a much smaller screen, a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 and a little bit less pixels per inch of display. Google Pixel 3a XL has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia acro S, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has a bit better performance than Xperia acro S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much longer battery life than Xperia acro S, because it has a 3700mAh battery capacity against 1910mAh.
The Google Pixel 3a XL captures greater pictures and videos than Sony Xperia acro S, because it has a camera in the back with more mega pixels, a lot better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light images.
Google Pixel 3a XL costs a bit more money than the Xperia acro S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.