Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-05-30 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.96 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.19 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.10 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1910mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 290 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a lot better than the Xperia acro S, getting an 83.3 score against 62. Galaxy S9's construction is much newer and way thinner, but a little heavier than the Xperia acro S. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little sharper display than Xperia acro S, because it has a lot larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a way better display pixel density.
Galaxy S9 features a greater hardware performance than Sony Xperia acro S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 more cores and 3 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a way better camera than Xperia acro S, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia acro S, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows up to 400 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better battery lifetime than Xperia acro S, because it has a 3000mAh battery size instead of 1910mAh.
The Galaxy S9 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.