Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.57 x 2.92 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2390mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 588 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is a lot better than Xperia C's general score of 57.5. The Galaxy S9 is a a little heavier but just a bit thinner cellphone than the Xperia C. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a more vivid display than Xperia C, because it has a larger screen, a lot more pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia C, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 has a more powerful processor than Xperia C, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots way better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia C, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back camera. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has greater battery duration than Xperia C, because it has a 26% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a little more expensive than Sony Xperia C, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.