Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-12-05 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.47 x 2.43 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.08 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 530 hours standby time 6.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than Xperia E dual, getting an 83.8 score against 51.6. The Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer and way thinner cellphone than the Xperia E dual, but it's also incredibly heavier. Galaxy A50 counts with a much better screen than Sony Xperia E dual, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a way larger display and a way higher screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia E dual, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A50 has a very superior performance than Xperia E dual, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior battery performance than Xperia E dual, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1500mAh. The Galaxy A50 has a greater camera than Sony Xperia E dual, because it has a way better 1920x1080 video quality and a way better 25 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.