Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-01-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.65 x 2.46 x 0.47 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.17 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 498 hours standby time 8.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is much better than the Xperia E1, having a overall score of 83.8 against 54.4. Galaxy A50 is a notably newer and extremely thinner phone than the Xperia E1, although it's also extremely heavier. The Galaxy A50 features a greater processing power than Xperia E1, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A50 features a bit better looking display than Xperia E1, because it has a much better pixel count per inch of display, a really bigger screen and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xperia E1, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 124 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia E1, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A50 shoots way better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia E1, because it has a lot higher 25 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also the cheapest, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.