Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1680 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is better than the Xperia L4, with a global score of 80 against 71.8. Google Pixel 3 is an older device than the Xperia L4, but Google was able to make it a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more powerful CPU than Sony Xperia L4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 features a much better looking display than Sony Xperia L4, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1080 x 2160 resolution and a better screen pixel density. The Google Pixel 3 captures much better photos and videos than Sony Xperia L4, because although it has a back camera with less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
The Xperia L4 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xperia L4 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xperia L4 has better battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has 3580mAh of battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.