Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1680 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 295 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has a global score of 77, which is just a bit better than the Xperia L4's 71.8 general score. Even though the HTC U Ultra is incredibly older than the Xperia L4, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner. The Xperia L4 counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with a larger number of cores.
HTC U Ultra has a much better looking display than Xperia L4, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater quantity of pixels per screen inch and a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution. HTC U Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia L4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Xperia L4, because although it has a camera with lesser mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor, a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images. The Sony Xperia L4 features improved battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3580mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.