Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1 | Android 4.0 |
| 2013-06-04 | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.88 x 2.44 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Purple, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 498 hours standby time 10.3 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is much better than Sony Xperia M, getting a global score of 71.5 against 57. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version while Sony Xperia M has Android 4.3. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a a little bit thinner but somewhat heavier device than Sony Xperia M.
The Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia M, because although it has a worse graphics processing unit, and they both have 2 cores, the Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features just a bit better looking display than Sony Xperia M, because it has a much higher 1280 x 720 resolution, a larger display and a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy S III Cricket takes way better photos and videos than Xperia M, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 1920x1080 video resolution. Galaxy S III Cricket has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia M, because it has 32 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 64 GB.
Galaxy S III Cricket has better battery performance than Sony Xperia M, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket and the Xperia M cost the same, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.