Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-08-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.51 x 2.83 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.26 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 229 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 595 hours standby time 11.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is way better than Xperia M2 Aqua's general score of 61.7. The LG V35 ThinQ design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Xperia M2 Aqua's, although it is also a little heavier. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a faster CPU than Xperia M2 Aqua, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ features a sharper display than Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a much better screen pixels density, a larger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has 56 GB more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than Xperia M2 Aqua, because it has a lot better video definition and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Xperia M2 Aqua, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.