Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.73 x 2.86 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Orange and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 210.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 8939 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 779 hours standby time 13.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a lot better than Sony Xperia M4 Aqua's 69 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua. The Xperia M4 Aqua has a bit better display than Galaxy A50, although it has a way smaller screen, a lot lesser pixels per inch of display and a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution.
Xperia M4 Aqua counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xperia M4 Aqua also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much better photos and videos than Xperia M4 Aqua, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low-light situations and a back camera with a lot higher 25 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia M4 Aqua, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery duration than Xperia M4 Aqua, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the Sony Xperia M4 Aqua.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.