Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.45 x 2.34 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 2,2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 470 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is a lot better than the Sony Xperia Miro, getting an 80.7 score against 52.3. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is noticeably newer and a lot thinner, but also incredibly heavier than the Sony Xperia Miro. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a much greater hardware performance than Sony Xperia Miro, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 3 XL features a much better display than Xperia Miro, because it has a way larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and way more pixels per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a way bigger memory for apps and games than Sony Xperia Miro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3 XL takes a lot better pictures and videos than Xperia Miro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way more mega-pixels camera in the back. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much longer battery performance than Xperia Miro, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3 XL costs a little more money than the Xperia Miro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.