Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-06-13 | 2019-05-07 |
| 4.45 x 2.34 x 0.39 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 3.88 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 7.29 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 2,2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 470 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is much better than the Sony Xperia miro, having a 78.8 score against 52.3. The Google Pixel 3a construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but also incredibly heavier than Sony Xperia miro. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a has an older 11 version and Sony Xperia miro has Android 4.0.4.
Google Pixel 3a features a much better looking screen than Sony Xperia miro, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2220, a lot greater pixel amount per inch of screen and a much larger screen. Google Pixel 3a has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia miro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much greater performance than Xperia miro, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM memory. Google Pixel 3a has a very superior camera than Xperia miro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a much longer battery duration than Xperia miro, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
Google Pixel 3a costs a little more money than the Xperia miro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.