Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 96.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-10 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.54 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Frosted Black | -- |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 22.92 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO-I is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A52, with a overall score of 96.3 against 90.7. The Xperia PRO-I construction is just a little thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy A52. Sony Xperia PRO-I counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a same size display, the Sony Xperia PRO-I also has a lot higher pixels density and a way higher 1644 x 3840 resolution.
Sony Xperia PRO-I has a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB, the Sony Xperia PRO-I also has more internal storage capacity. Xperia PRO-I features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia PRO-I also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a battery performance that is just as good as the battery duration in Xperia PRO-I. The Galaxy A52 has a superior camera than Xperia PRO-I, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.