Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia PRO is better than the Google Pixel 3a, having a 94.3 score against 78.8. These phones use Android operating system, but Sony Xperia PRO has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. Sony Xperia PRO's body is newer, but way thicker and way heavier than Google Pixel 3a.
The Xperia PRO features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xperia PRO also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xperia PRO features a better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a better pixels count per inch of display, a lot higher resolution of 1644 x 3840 and a bigger screen.
The Sony Xperia PRO has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB and 512 GB internal memory capacity. Xperia PRO counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Xperia PRO has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 3a, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.