Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-26 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO has a general score of 94.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Xperia PRO has an older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Even though Xperia PRO is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it is way thicker and much heavier.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia PRO also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Sony Xperia PRO has a better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a quite larger screen, a much better 1644 x 3840px resolution and a much greater pixel number per inch of display.
The Xperia PRO features a superior memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 448 GB more internal memory. The Xperia PRO features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a back camera with less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Although Sony Xperia PRO is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Google Pixel 3a XL, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.