Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-26 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 22.92 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ, having a overall score of 94.3 against 82.5. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia PRO has the previous 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the Xperia PRO is much newer than the LG V30S ThinQ, it is much thicker and much heavier.
The Xperia PRO has a bit better performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xperia PRO also has 2 GB more RAM. Sony Xperia PRO has a little bit better display than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a little better pixels quantity per inch in the display, a higher 1644 x 3840 resolution and a quite bigger display.
The Sony Xperia PRO features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xperia PRO has better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent greater battery size.
The Xperia PRO counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a lower (4K) video quality, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor.
Although Xperia PRO is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V30S ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V30S ThinQ. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Xperia PRO, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V30S ThinQ, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.