Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-26 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 22.92 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO has a general score of 94.3, which is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's overall score of 87.6. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xperia PRO has the previous 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version. The Xperia PRO construction is newer than the LG V60 ThinQ's, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Sony Xperia PRO has a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1644 x 3840px and much more pixels per display inch. Sony Xperia PRO features a superior storage to install applications and games than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a processor that is very similar to Sony Xperia PRO's CPU, both have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM. Sony Xperia PRO shoots clearer videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a 0.59 inches sensor, the Sony Xperia PRO also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light environments.
The LG V60 ThinQ has improved battery duration than Xperia PRO, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Although Sony Xperia PRO is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.