Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-26 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 643 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 22.92 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia PRO is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 94.3 against 80.1. Xperia PRO's body is newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xperia PRO has the older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Sony Xperia PRO counts with just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Sony Xperia PRO also has a larger amount of RAM. Sony Xperia PRO counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a quite greater screen pixel density, a bigger display and a better 1644 x 3840 pixels resolution.
Sony Xperia PRO takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the Sony Xperia PRO also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Sony Xperia PRO has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia PRO, because it has a 13% bigger battery capacity.
Xperia PRO costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.