Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2021-01-26 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 2500.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO is just a bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 3, with a 94.3 score against 90.6. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Xperia PRO has older 10 version and Galaxy Z Fold 3 has Android 11 version. Xperia PRO's design is lighter but way thicker than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and both of them were released with only 7 months difference.
Sony Xperia PRO features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1644 x 3840 resolution and a lot more pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit superior processor than Xperia PRO, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Sony Xperia PRO has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 512 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB. Galaxy Z Fold 3 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia PRO, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
The Sony Xperia PRO captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the Sony Xperia PRO also has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.