Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-01-14 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.50 x 3.30 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 269.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1071 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Xperia T2 Ultra, having an 81.3 score against 63.9. LG V35 ThinQ's body is way newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Xperia T2 Ultra. The LG V35 ThinQ has a greater hardware performance than Xperia T2 Ultra, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a brighter display than Xperia T2 Ultra, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution and a much higher screen pixels density. The LG V35 ThinQ captures way better photos and videos than Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back camera with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution and a much bigger camera aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has 56 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit better battery life than Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V35 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.