Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3 | -- |
| 2014-01-14 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 3.30 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 269.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 1071 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xperia T2 Ultra's global score of 63.9. The LG Velvet is a a lot newer phone than the Xperia T2 Ultra, but it's a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The LG Velvet has a little more vivid display than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a quite larger screen, a way higher screen density and a much better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia T2 Ultra, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM and more CPU cores. LG Velvet shoots greater videos and photos than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a way larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Velvet has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features a very superior battery performance than Xperia T2 Ultra, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
LG Velvet is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.