Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-06-03 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.93 x 3.03 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 277 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 639 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than the Xperia T3, getting an 80.7 score against 62.5. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is extremely newer, but just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xperia T3. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a slightly better looking display than Xperia T3, because it has a way higher screen pixels density, a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a bigger display.
Google Pixel 3 XL features a little bit better processing power than Sony Xperia T3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots much better pictures and videos than Sony Xperia T3, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a way better 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Xperia T3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a superior battery duration than Xperia T3, because it has 3430mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also the cheapest, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.