Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-06-03 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.93 x 3.03 x 0.28 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 277 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8928 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 639 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the Xperia T3, getting a score of 83.8 against 62.5. Galaxy A50's construction is notably newer, but somewhat heavier and a little thicker than the Xperia T3. The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia T3, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a display that's just as good as the screen in Sony Xperia T3, although the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a higher number of pixels per inch of screen, a larger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia T3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a much higher 25 MP resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia T3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a much better battery lifetime than Xperia T3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Xperia T3, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.