Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-06-03 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.93 x 3.03 x 0.28 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Purple and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 277 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8928 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.10 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 639 hours standby time 12.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an overall score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the Xperia T3's overall score of 62.5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's construction is a lot newer, but somewhat thicker and much heavier than Xperia T3. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version and Xperia T3 has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Sony Xperia T3 and the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G feature very similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a larger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster processor than Sony Xperia T3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Sony Xperia T3, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A51 5G has a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia T3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Galaxy A51 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Sony Xperia T3, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Sony Xperia T3, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.