Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a general score of 80.2, which is much better than the Xperia X Compact's 71.8 score. Even though the Google Pixel and the Xperia X Compact were released only 1 months apart, the Google Pixel body is just a little heavier but also a little bit thinner than the Xperia X Compact.
The Google Pixel counts with just a bit better display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a better pixels density. The Google Pixel counts with more memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel features a little better performance than Xperia X Compact, because although it has less cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
Xperia X Compact captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same video resolution, the Xperia X Compact also has better video frame rates and a lot more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.