Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is much better than Xperia X Compact, with a general score of 80.7 against 71.8. The Google Pixel 3 XL design is a lot newer and thinner than Xperia X Compact's, although it's also noticeably heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has 2 more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a more vivid screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px, a really larger screen and a much greater screen pixels density. Xperia X Compact counts with a better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 3 XL features improved battery lifetime than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 3430mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Xperia X Compact captures a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xperia X Compact also counts with a camera in the back with a much better 23 mega-pixels resolution, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a larger sensor capturing better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.