Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is much better than the Xperia X Compact's 71.8 general score. Google Pixel 4's construction is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but also heavier than the Xperia X Compact. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a better screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a bigger display, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a higher screen pixels density.
Google Pixel 4 has a bit better CPU than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM. The Xperia X Compact shoots clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xperia X Compact also counts with a larger back camera sensor, a camera with lot more mega-pixels and better video frame rates.
The Xperia X Compact features a better memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 has just a little bit longer battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.