Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Sony Xperia X Compact, getting an 82.9 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 4a is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than the Sony Xperia X Compact, although it is a little bit heavier. Google Pixel 4a counts with a more vivid display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a bigger display, a greater pixels count in each inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Google Pixel 4a features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Google Pixel 4a has a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM memory.
Xperia X Compact has a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xperia X Compact also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP, better video frame rates and a larger sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Google Pixel 4a counts with longer battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.