Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G is way better than Sony Xperia X Compact, having an 87.5 score against 71.8. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a noticeably newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Sony Xperia X Compact, although it is somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 4a 5G has just a bit better screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a way larger screen.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP resolution and a tinier camera sensor providing a worse image quality, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger camera aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 3885mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.