Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-09-08 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ has a global score of 82.5, which is much better than Xperia X Compact's score of 71.8. The LG V30S ThinQ design is newer and a lot thinner than Xperia X Compact's, but it's somewhat heavier. The LG V30S ThinQ has a brighter screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a really larger screen, a much better amount of pixels per screen inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia X Compact, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Sony Xperia X Compact has a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Sony Xperia X Compact also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better video frame rate and a back camera with way more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with superior battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.