Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xperia X Compact, getting a general score of 87.1 against 71.8. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design is extremely newer and a bit thinner than Xperia X Compact's, but it is also heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot larger screen, a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite better display pixels density.
The Xperia X Compact features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a really longer battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video, a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.