Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is just a bit better than the Xperia X Compact, having a score of 78.5 against 71.8. The Motorola One Action body is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than Xperia X Compact. The Motorola One Action counts with a little faster CPU than Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater number of cores and 1 GB more RAM.
Motorola One Action features a little more vivid display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a better pixels density. Xperia X Compact shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for capturing images and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xperia X Compact also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola One Action counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One Action has improved battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.