Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is a bit better than the Xperia X Compact's 71.8 general score. Nubia Red Magic 3S is a much newer device than the Xperia X Compact, although it is much heavier and just a little thicker. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite superior performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little more vivid screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a lot larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality, a larger aperture and a way higher video quality. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has an 85% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.