Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is a bit better than Sony Xperia X Compact's 71.8 global score. Even though nubia Red Magic 5S is incredibly newer than Sony Xperia X Compact, it's incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a brighter display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a way bigger display, a bit better pixel density and a lot higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit superior processing unit than Xperia X Compact, because it has 5 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The nubia Red Magic 5S has more storage to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much longer battery life than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a very superior camera than Xperia X Compact, because it has a back camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.