Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is better than the Xperia X Compact's general score of 71.8. The Galaxy A25 5G design is noticeably newer and somewhat thinner, but notably heavier than the Xperia X Compact. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a more vivid screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a really bigger display.
The Xperia X Compact counts with a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Galaxy A25 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Xperia X Compact, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality photos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a way better 50 megapixels resolution camera and a larger aperture for better images in low-light environments.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A25 5G has a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.