Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2016-09-08 | -- |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 4.76 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a score of 82.9, which is much better than Sony Xperia X Compact's score of 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy A34 body is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than Sony Xperia X Compact. The Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better CPU than Xperia X Compact, because it has more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Galaxy A34 features a bit better looking screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot bigger display, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and more pixels per inch in the display. Xperia X Compact features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a lot lower resolution back camera, a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a worse image and video quality and a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited environments.
The Sony Xperia X Compact features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A34 features a way better battery life than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.