Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is a lot better than the Xperia X Compact's 71.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is incredibly newer and thinner than the Xperia X Compact's, but it's a lot heavier. Galaxy A52 has a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster).
The Galaxy A52 counts with just a bit better looking display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a really bigger screen and a greater screen density. The Galaxy A52 counts with a greater camera than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much larger back camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.