Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is a lot better than Xperia X Compact, getting a 91.3 score against 71.8. Although Galaxy A52 5G is a lot heavier than the Xperia X Compact, it's thinner and way newer. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a really larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a greater display pixel density.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Compact, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit better processor than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and 2 more processing cores.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures way better pictures and videos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a camera in the back with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a superior battery life than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.