Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia X Compact's 71.8 overall score. The Galaxy A70 body is way newer and thinner than the Sony Xperia X Compact's, but it's extremely heavier. Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better looking display than Xperia X Compact, because it has a really bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite higher pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A70 features a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The Galaxy A70 counts with a really longer battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2700mAh. The Sony Xperia X Compact features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Sony Xperia X Compact also counts with a larger camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photographs and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.