Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the Xperia X Compact, having a 97.6 score against 71.8. Even though Galaxy Fold is extremely heavier than the Xperia X Compact, it's a lot thinner and also newer. Galaxy Fold counts with a little sharper display than Xperia X Compact, because it has a just a little better pixels count in each inch of display, a really bigger display and a way better 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Fold has a very superior memory for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a superior battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 62% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Xperia X Compact, because although it has a back facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution and a tinier sensor, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.