Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than the Sony Xperia X Compact, having a general score of 78.9 against 71.8. Although Samsung Galaxy M20 is much heavier than Sony Xperia X Compact, it's just a bit thinner and a lot newer. Samsung Galaxy M20 has just a bit better display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a way bigger display.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has just a little better processing power than Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a very superior battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xperia X Compact has a much better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia X Compact also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels, faster video frame rate and a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.