Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is way better than Sony Xperia X Compact, having a 90.8 score against 71.8. Although the Galaxy Note 20 is way heavier than the Sony Xperia X Compact, it's thinner and also extremely newer. The Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a just a bit more pixels per display inch, a lot higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a really larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a quite superior performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has 5 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a slightly better camera than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a superior battery performance than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.