Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2013-09-04 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Pink and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an overall score of 81.2, which is much better than the Xperia X Compact's score of 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an extremely older and somewhat heavier cellphone than Xperia X Compact, but Samsung made it thinner anyway. Galaxy Note 3 has a brighter screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a way better 1920 x 1080 resolution, a just a little higher pixels number in each inch in the screen and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB against 256 GB, it also counts with more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a little better processing power than Xperia X Compact, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Xperia X Compact shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xperia X Compact also has a camera with a much better resolution, better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a way larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 counts with better battery life than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.