Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a lot better than the Sony Xperia X Compact, having a general score of 98 against 71.8. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's body is way newer and just a little bit thinner than Sony Xperia X Compact's, although it is also notably heavier. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a superior processing power than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a better looking screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a really bigger display. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much better battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has an 85% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.