Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | -- |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 4.76 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is much better than the Sony Xperia X Compact's 71.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a much thinner and lighter device than Sony Xperia X Compact. The Galaxy S25 has a much better looking display than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater screen density, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a really bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S25 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Xperia X Compact has a much better hardware performance than Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser cpu cores (although faster).
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a much longer battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh. Galaxy S25 captures way better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much higher video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a camera with much more mega pixels and a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.